Daily Archives: April 19, 2008

Being Determined

“We are reconciled to the Father in that the Spirit reconciles us to the Father’s reconciled Son.  Therefore our meaning, our identity and purpose, are determined so: we are what the Son is for the Father.  We are the segullah, the dear treasure, of that sheer unfathomable love that is the source of all.

Again, we do not want this.  We do not want to be determined by anyone’s determinate love.  If we are willing to be loved, it is only insofar as the other, even or especially if this is God, is willing to ‘accept’ us ‘just as we are’; whereas of course authentic love is the willingness to be changed by the other.  It is our passion to be pure spirit, to escape all determination.  It is our passion to be a se, in a way that God himself disdains. 

But neither, of course do we truly want to be free.  We want only an abstract freedom which in fact leaves us unmoved.  As the dismal outcomes of modernity teach, modernity’s freedom is profoundly reactionary.

The problem is the great political problem.  The cities of the world cannot solve it, which is why none finally prevails against the gates of death.  It is solved in the Kingdom, and so, in fits and anticipatory starts, in the Church.  For it is in the Church that it can be said ‘the Lord is the Spirit’; that the reconciliation worked by the Father as mon-arch of Son and Spirit is actual in God’s history with us.  The reconciliation of meaning and freedom is community, and the Church is the foretaste of the community in the triune God for which we are created.”

–Robert W. Jenson, “Reconciliation in God”, in The Theology of Reconciliation, Colin Gunton, ed. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2003), 166.

Tradition and Revelation

“Tradition in the church, then, is a process of gift and reception in which the deposit of faith — the teaching and ethics of the Christian community — is recieved, interpreted and handed on through time.  As such, when it is true giving and reception, it realises the Father’s giving of his Son, the Son’s self-giving to death and indeed the very life of God of which they are the economic expression.  It is for reasons such as this that we should maintain a strong view of the centrality of the particulars with have been handed down to us, to and through the biblical writers, but a less enthusiastic endorsement of the ways in which the authority of the exponents of that tradition has intruded upon its due and non-coercive transmission.  Churchly authority has not always taken the form of the authority of grace, and all too often has taken the form of the expression of coercive power.  The conclusion to draw is that the greater weight one can throw upon the faith once for all delivered to the saints, by which is mean the confession of Jesus and his meaning as the revelation of God, found like in the apostolic preaching and rules of faith, the less we have to trust in the judgment of offices, whether Holy or Protestant administrative.  It is a recipe, one might say, either for chaos or for allowing the wheat and the tares to grow together until the harvest,  Thus truth is indeed the daughter of time: the time God gives his church for faithful reception and transmission of the gospel.”

–Colin Gunton, A Brief Theology of Revelation (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1995), 103-104.

Switch to our mobile site