<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Threaded Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2009/08/21/threaded-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2009/08/21/threaded-comments/</link>
	<description>Where youthful Barthianism never dies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:24:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wiebe</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2009/08/21/threaded-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-10027</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wiebe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 02:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=2783#comment-10027</guid>
		<description>As a possible compromise, I would suggest that you turn down the levels of threading to a more manageable level, say 3 or so. The setting is under Settings -&gt; Discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a possible compromise, I would suggest that you turn down the levels of threading to a more manageable level, say 3 or so. The setting is under Settings -&gt; Discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2009/08/21/threaded-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-9966</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=2783#comment-9966</guid>
		<description>Voted no, because I lean that way, but I&#039;m still on the fence. 

It seems like it makes it a little harder to follow who&#039;s talking to who when there are a lot of comments. I think I prefer the previous version of comments (not back to the wordpress days, but the first attempt at the dot-com website).

However, on the plus side of things, it makes navigating and browsing between different topics a little smoother since the comments pop down without going to a new page.

I suppose this wishy-washyness isn&#039;t too helpful! So no! Just like the return to Kant, we must return to non-threaded comments! Don&#039;t sacrifice the tradition for relevance! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voted no, because I lean that way, but I&#8217;m still on the fence. </p>
<p>It seems like it makes it a little harder to follow who&#8217;s talking to who when there are a lot of comments. I think I prefer the previous version of comments (not back to the wordpress days, but the first attempt at the dot-com website).</p>
<p>However, on the plus side of things, it makes navigating and browsing between different topics a little smoother since the comments pop down without going to a new page.</p>
<p>I suppose this wishy-washyness isn&#8217;t too helpful! So no! Just like the return to Kant, we must return to non-threaded comments! Don&#8217;t sacrifice the tradition for relevance! ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

