<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holy Water Under the Bridge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2009/10/28/holy-water-under-the-bridge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2009/10/28/holy-water-under-the-bridge/</link>
	<description>Where youthful Barthianism never dies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:24:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Donato</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2009/10/28/holy-water-under-the-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-12040</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Donato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3066#comment-12040</guid>
		<description>Crickets after he said &quot;infallible.&quot; The literacy rate in America is astounds me. Colbert covered this wonderfully.

But of course this isn&#039;t about gays and women—inclusivism; it&#039;s about &lt;i&gt;visible&lt;/i&gt; unity and the lack thereof in &#039;christendom&#039;, not least in the face of an increasingly &#039;post-Christian&#039; West.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crickets after he said &#8220;infallible.&#8221; The literacy rate in America is astounds me. Colbert covered this wonderfully.</p>
<p>But of course this isn&#8217;t about gays and women—inclusivism; it&#8217;s about <i>visible</i> unity and the lack thereof in &#8216;christendom&#8217;, not least in the face of an increasingly &#8216;post-Christian&#8217; West.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halden</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2009/10/28/holy-water-under-the-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-12033</link>
		<dc:creator>Halden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3066#comment-12033</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I agree he didn&#039;t really say anything helpful. Colbert was awesome though. &quot;Why don&#039;t you just join the Catholic church? Where there are no gay priests.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I agree he didn&#8217;t really say anything helpful. Colbert was awesome though. &#8220;Why don&#8217;t you just join the Catholic church? Where there are no gay priests.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John R</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2009/10/28/holy-water-under-the-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-12031</link>
		<dc:creator>John R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3066#comment-12031</guid>
		<description>Fr. Balmer does a very good job of smashing narrow anti-Christian stereotypes.  Unfortunately, I&#039;m not sure he said anything that could challenge the audience; it wasn&#039;t clear in what tangible way Christianity is different from bourgeois agnosticism/deism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fr. Balmer does a very good job of smashing narrow anti-Christian stereotypes.  Unfortunately, I&#8217;m not sure he said anything that could challenge the audience; it wasn&#8217;t clear in what tangible way Christianity is different from bourgeois agnosticism/deism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myles</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2009/10/28/holy-water-under-the-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-12030</link>
		<dc:creator>myles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3066#comment-12030</guid>
		<description>watching this again just makes me more angry. i mean, sure, this is the Colbert show, but Balmer&#039;s sheite is just slogany, trite, and bland, old-school liberalism. Hope you enjoy selling your books, Balmer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>watching this again just makes me more angry. i mean, sure, this is the Colbert show, but Balmer&#8217;s sheite is just slogany, trite, and bland, old-school liberalism. Hope you enjoy selling your books, Balmer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myles</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2009/10/28/holy-water-under-the-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-12028</link>
		<dc:creator>myles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3066#comment-12028</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really getting tired of Balmer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really getting tired of Balmer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2009/10/28/holy-water-under-the-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-12011</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3066#comment-12011</guid>
		<description>Well, Colbert was entertaining as always. But, Rev. Balmer&#039;s statements against &quot;defining negatively&quot; is obviously not a fair criticism, nor very insightful, of Rome&#039;s position on ordination and homosexuality, both of which have been presented -- agree or disagree -- within a positive comprehension of gender and bodies, sacrifice and love. 

Alternatively, Rowan Williams etc. is not merely offering a &quot;positive&quot; and &quot;inclusive&quot; ethic; he/they are likewise situating these issues of ordination and homosexuality within a, e.g, &quot;graced body&quot; comprehension of the human person over-against R.C. natural law. Rev. Balmer manages to dumb-down and obscure both sides of the debate with cliche slogans. Of course, it was just a new bit on a comedy show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Colbert was entertaining as always. But, Rev. Balmer&#8217;s statements against &#8220;defining negatively&#8221; is obviously not a fair criticism, nor very insightful, of Rome&#8217;s position on ordination and homosexuality, both of which have been presented &#8212; agree or disagree &#8212; within a positive comprehension of gender and bodies, sacrifice and love. </p>
<p>Alternatively, Rowan Williams etc. is not merely offering a &#8220;positive&#8221; and &#8220;inclusive&#8221; ethic; he/they are likewise situating these issues of ordination and homosexuality within a, e.g, &#8220;graced body&#8221; comprehension of the human person over-against R.C. natural law. Rev. Balmer manages to dumb-down and obscure both sides of the debate with cliche slogans. Of course, it was just a new bit on a comedy show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

