<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No national anthem at Goshen, please</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2010/02/15/no-national-anthem-at-goshen-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2010/02/15/no-national-anthem-at-goshen-please/</link>
	<description>Where youthful Barthianism never dies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:24:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Alexis-Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2010/02/15/no-national-anthem-at-goshen-please/comment-page-1/#comment-14509</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Alexis-Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3483#comment-14509</guid>
		<description>Stanley Hauerwas signed the Jesus Radicals letter today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stanley Hauerwas signed the Jesus Radicals letter today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.O. Flyer</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2010/02/15/no-national-anthem-at-goshen-please/comment-page-1/#comment-14437</link>
		<dc:creator>R.O. Flyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3483#comment-14437</guid>
		<description>I have read their introduction to The New Yoder and I agree with them, but they aren&#039;t talking about Mennonites--they&#039;re talking about recent interpretations/appropriations of Yoder! That&#039;s not at all what I&#039;m talking about here, Andy. I&#039;m talking about the Mennonite community at large (who outside of Goshen and AMBS aren&#039;t really reading much of Yoder). Of course, I&#039;m not suggesting that many Mennonites are reading Niebuhr either. My point is simply that Niebuhr&#039;s influence isn&#039;t easily overcome precisely because whether we know it or not Niebuhr has shaped a large part of contemporary Mennonite identity. 

Regarding the current situation, what we are seeing here with Brenneman is a whole host of mid-twentieth century debates reprised. What I find interesting is how Mennonites have responded to this--particularly on the Jesus Radicals site and the FB site--still operating within this grid, at least in part. In other words, I&#039;m concerned that our response to this will simply play into and reprise the old debate and therefore there will be no progress made. Also, I actually don&#039;t think Brenneman is capable of seeing outside the old Hershberger/Burkholder debate--so responses need to be aware of all this. That&#039;s all I&#039;m saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read their introduction to The New Yoder and I agree with them, but they aren&#8217;t talking about Mennonites&#8211;they&#8217;re talking about recent interpretations/appropriations of Yoder! That&#8217;s not at all what I&#8217;m talking about here, Andy. I&#8217;m talking about the Mennonite community at large (who outside of Goshen and AMBS aren&#8217;t really reading much of Yoder). Of course, I&#8217;m not suggesting that many Mennonites are reading Niebuhr either. My point is simply that Niebuhr&#8217;s influence isn&#8217;t easily overcome precisely because whether we know it or not Niebuhr has shaped a large part of contemporary Mennonite identity. </p>
<p>Regarding the current situation, what we are seeing here with Brenneman is a whole host of mid-twentieth century debates reprised. What I find interesting is how Mennonites have responded to this&#8211;particularly on the Jesus Radicals site and the FB site&#8211;still operating within this grid, at least in part. In other words, I&#8217;m concerned that our response to this will simply play into and reprise the old debate and therefore there will be no progress made. Also, I actually don&#8217;t think Brenneman is capable of seeing outside the old Hershberger/Burkholder debate&#8211;so responses need to be aware of all this. That&#8217;s all I&#8217;m saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyAB</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2010/02/15/no-national-anthem-at-goshen-please/comment-page-1/#comment-14436</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3483#comment-14436</guid>
		<description>RO: There is a new book out called &quot;The New Yoder&quot; in which Huebner and Dula argue that the old Neibuhr debate is dead. We are past it. it is in their introduction. Check it out sometime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RO: There is a new book out called &#8220;The New Yoder&#8221; in which Huebner and Dula argue that the old Neibuhr debate is dead. We are past it. it is in their introduction. Check it out sometime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyAB</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2010/02/15/no-national-anthem-at-goshen-please/comment-page-1/#comment-14435</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3483#comment-14435</guid>
		<description>Brenneman and Burkholder being specimens one and two. Sure. But they are such a minority in this church. That is what is so outrageous about this. These administrators have went rogue and made a decision that has repercussions for us all. Brenneman admits in his speech that Yoder is the main influence among Mennonites.

Most people in this area, one of the hubs of Mennonitedom, simply are already enmeshed in all sorts of activities in their communities, unlike 50 years ago when the debate was whether they should take library jobs because they were city jobs backed by evil tax dollars. That would not occur to any Mennonite that I know today. Not many MCUSA Mennonites question whether Mennonites should be on the goshen city council at all (Mennonites control the city council in Goshen). Some do. I would. But that is not necessarily Neibuhrian influence. It&#039;s more Schleitheim or something.

You would have to show where you think you a Neibuhr influence I guess. And then show that it is Neibuhr not some other past like Schleitheim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brenneman and Burkholder being specimens one and two. Sure. But they are such a minority in this church. That is what is so outrageous about this. These administrators have went rogue and made a decision that has repercussions for us all. Brenneman admits in his speech that Yoder is the main influence among Mennonites.</p>
<p>Most people in this area, one of the hubs of Mennonitedom, simply are already enmeshed in all sorts of activities in their communities, unlike 50 years ago when the debate was whether they should take library jobs because they were city jobs backed by evil tax dollars. That would not occur to any Mennonite that I know today. Not many MCUSA Mennonites question whether Mennonites should be on the goshen city council at all (Mennonites control the city council in Goshen). Some do. I would. But that is not necessarily Neibuhrian influence. It&#8217;s more Schleitheim or something.</p>
<p>You would have to show where you think you a Neibuhr influence I guess. And then show that it is Neibuhr not some other past like Schleitheim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.O. Flyer</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2010/02/15/no-national-anthem-at-goshen-please/comment-page-1/#comment-14432</link>
		<dc:creator>R.O. Flyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3483#comment-14432</guid>
		<description>I guess I disagree with you on this. I&#039;m not suggesting that the debate is the same as it was 30-50 years ago--obviously that&#039;s not accurate. But, I do think that the repercussions of Niebuhr&#039;s influence on 20th century Mennonite identity persists into the 21st century. I guess what I&#039;m trying to say is that, whether consciously or not, many Mennonites continue to work within the Niebuhrian grid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I disagree with you on this. I&#8217;m not suggesting that the debate is the same as it was 30-50 years ago&#8211;obviously that&#8217;s not accurate. But, I do think that the repercussions of Niebuhr&#8217;s influence on 20th century Mennonite identity persists into the 21st century. I guess what I&#8217;m trying to say is that, whether consciously or not, many Mennonites continue to work within the Niebuhrian grid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halden</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2010/02/15/no-national-anthem-at-goshen-please/comment-page-1/#comment-14431</link>
		<dc:creator>Halden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3483#comment-14431</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyAB</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2010/02/15/no-national-anthem-at-goshen-please/comment-page-1/#comment-14430</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3483#comment-14430</guid>
		<description>Oh, and thank you Halden for raising the issue here. the letter has been up a week...over 800 sigs so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and thank you Halden for raising the issue here. the letter has been up a week&#8230;over 800 sigs so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyAB</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2010/02/15/no-national-anthem-at-goshen-please/comment-page-1/#comment-14429</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3483#comment-14429</guid>
		<description>Scott,

Bluffton and Bethel, unlike Goshen College, are not actually owned by the Mennonite Church. they are &quot;Mennonite affiliated&quot; schools, but are not actually subject to the mennonite board of education. Those two schools are Incorporated by the towns their respective towns. not only that, but Goshen made its decision in the midst of two american wars, and a huge outcry in the goshen area about immigration. Most of the townfolks are not only patriots, but rabid racists who see the anthem as a kind of oath of loyalty that defines americans over against those immigrant brown skinned people. We&#039;ve had cross burnings and more in the past few years around here.

Moreover, the process Goshen went through was not really a dialogue. The Presidents council did everything the other side said they would not want done, including a prayer afterward. Most of us thought the thing was for show, to show the neighbors how much we care, and then we&#039;d go back to our own thing. Most students and faculty, most Mennonite in the area are very much against this move. They woudl be okay with some kind of other song. I would personally suggest that we pass out Kazoos to everyone before the game and we can all play the anthem on the kazoos. wouldn&#039;t that be awesome!

this does not come out of nowhere. Brenneman is stuck in debates that were happening 50 years ago with his rhetoric of &quot;yes&quot; and &quot;no.&quot; Most Mennonites are nowhere near that debate. Now it is a matter of discernment, not a matter of whether we participate in things but how and when. 

Sigglekow is right about Neibuhr, but it is an old debate that is really not relevant to Mennonites any longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Bluffton and Bethel, unlike Goshen College, are not actually owned by the Mennonite Church. they are &#8220;Mennonite affiliated&#8221; schools, but are not actually subject to the mennonite board of education. Those two schools are Incorporated by the towns their respective towns. not only that, but Goshen made its decision in the midst of two american wars, and a huge outcry in the goshen area about immigration. Most of the townfolks are not only patriots, but rabid racists who see the anthem as a kind of oath of loyalty that defines americans over against those immigrant brown skinned people. We&#8217;ve had cross burnings and more in the past few years around here.</p>
<p>Moreover, the process Goshen went through was not really a dialogue. The Presidents council did everything the other side said they would not want done, including a prayer afterward. Most of us thought the thing was for show, to show the neighbors how much we care, and then we&#8217;d go back to our own thing. Most students and faculty, most Mennonite in the area are very much against this move. They woudl be okay with some kind of other song. I would personally suggest that we pass out Kazoos to everyone before the game and we can all play the anthem on the kazoos. wouldn&#8217;t that be awesome!</p>
<p>this does not come out of nowhere. Brenneman is stuck in debates that were happening 50 years ago with his rhetoric of &#8220;yes&#8221; and &#8220;no.&#8221; Most Mennonites are nowhere near that debate. Now it is a matter of discernment, not a matter of whether we participate in things but how and when. </p>
<p>Sigglekow is right about Neibuhr, but it is an old debate that is really not relevant to Mennonites any longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott C</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2010/02/15/no-national-anthem-at-goshen-please/comment-page-1/#comment-14396</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3483#comment-14396</guid>
		<description>At the same time, since MCUSA hasn&#039;t taken a position on this (I&#039;m not sure it should, just because I&#039;m uncomfortable with top-down authority in my church), since there are other Mennonite colleges doing the same thing, and since this decision seems to be the result of a process of dialogue within the Goshen community (of which I am not a member; I&#039;m not an alumnus of GC), while I disagree with the decision I think I would oppose outright condemnation of Goshen because of it.  (The petition does not call for such condemnation).  I think I can see things from the other side here -- they&#039;re trying to be &quot;all things for all people&quot;, and some Mennonites legitimately disagree with me about saying the pledge of allegiance, singing the anthem, etc.  So I don&#039;t like it, and I&#039;ll sign the petition, but I wouldn&#039;t call for a &quot;shunning&quot; of GC over this.  (I don&#039;t really like shunning.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the same time, since MCUSA hasn&#8217;t taken a position on this (I&#8217;m not sure it should, just because I&#8217;m uncomfortable with top-down authority in my church), since there are other Mennonite colleges doing the same thing, and since this decision seems to be the result of a process of dialogue within the Goshen community (of which I am not a member; I&#8217;m not an alumnus of GC), while I disagree with the decision I think I would oppose outright condemnation of Goshen because of it.  (The petition does not call for such condemnation).  I think I can see things from the other side here &#8212; they&#8217;re trying to be &#8220;all things for all people&#8221;, and some Mennonites legitimately disagree with me about saying the pledge of allegiance, singing the anthem, etc.  So I don&#8217;t like it, and I&#8217;ll sign the petition, but I wouldn&#8217;t call for a &#8220;shunning&#8221; of GC over this.  (I don&#8217;t really like shunning.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott C</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2010/02/15/no-national-anthem-at-goshen-please/comment-page-1/#comment-14395</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3483#comment-14395</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m Mennonite and hadn&#039;t heard of this.  Even though I have friends with kids who play sports at Goshen.  To some extent, I&#039;m glad (that I hadn&#039;t heard of it earlier)  -- there are other things we need to be talking about at church than the politics of singing the national anthem at Goshen games.  

I&#039;m really, really, really uncomfortable with the fact that the president of the college &quot;gave a chapel message in which he hoped to move Goshen from “a culture of dissent” to “a culture of assent.”&quot; and &quot;stated that the early Anabaptists who died resisting such things as military service, church/state union and jingoistic songs like the national anthem were “perfectionists” who were on the side of dissent rather than the institutions who could put their beliefs into wider practice. They were part of “dissent standing outside the systems of the world” and for this Brenneman derisively called them “naysayers.”&quot; (http://www.jesusradicals.com/goshen-college-hurts-the-church/)

I think I&#039;m going to sign the petition now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m Mennonite and hadn&#8217;t heard of this.  Even though I have friends with kids who play sports at Goshen.  To some extent, I&#8217;m glad (that I hadn&#8217;t heard of it earlier)  &#8212; there are other things we need to be talking about at church than the politics of singing the national anthem at Goshen games.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m really, really, really uncomfortable with the fact that the president of the college &#8220;gave a chapel message in which he hoped to move Goshen from “a culture of dissent” to “a culture of assent.”&#8221; and &#8220;stated that the early Anabaptists who died resisting such things as military service, church/state union and jingoistic songs like the national anthem were “perfectionists” who were on the side of dissent rather than the institutions who could put their beliefs into wider practice. They were part of “dissent standing outside the systems of the world” and for this Brenneman derisively called them “naysayers.”&#8221; (<a href="http://www.jesusradicals.com/goshen-college-hurts-the-church/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jesusradicals.com/goshen-college-hurts-the-church/</a>)</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m going to sign the petition now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.O. Flyer</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2010/02/15/no-national-anthem-at-goshen-please/comment-page-1/#comment-14394</link>
		<dc:creator>R.O. Flyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3483#comment-14394</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Hill on the whole question of how we go about resisting this recent move. To simply say &quot;this goes against everything Mennonites stand for&quot; is not going to convince anyone of anything. The truth of the matter is that this recent news did not occur over night--there is a good deal of history to this decision. What this does show us is that the ghost of Reinhold Niebuhr still lurks in Mennonite circles. We need to interrogate the Niebuhrian assumptions at work here--the dualism of &quot;withdrawal&quot; or &quot;responsibility&quot; that persists as the general framework for folks like Brenneman and Burkholder before him. 

To suggest, as I fear Andy Alexis-Baker tends to do, that this decision is so obviously against the Mennonite tradition, is to ignore how deeply the Niebuhrian framework has shaped Mennonite identity. We need to be aware that this runs very very deep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Hill on the whole question of how we go about resisting this recent move. To simply say &#8220;this goes against everything Mennonites stand for&#8221; is not going to convince anyone of anything. The truth of the matter is that this recent news did not occur over night&#8211;there is a good deal of history to this decision. What this does show us is that the ghost of Reinhold Niebuhr still lurks in Mennonite circles. We need to interrogate the Niebuhrian assumptions at work here&#8211;the dualism of &#8220;withdrawal&#8221; or &#8220;responsibility&#8221; that persists as the general framework for folks like Brenneman and Burkholder before him. </p>
<p>To suggest, as I fear Andy Alexis-Baker tends to do, that this decision is so obviously against the Mennonite tradition, is to ignore how deeply the Niebuhrian framework has shaped Mennonite identity. We need to be aware that this runs very very deep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny Z</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2010/02/15/no-national-anthem-at-goshen-please/comment-page-1/#comment-14387</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3483#comment-14387</guid>
		<description>http://www.jesusradicals.com/anarchism/resistance-to-the-national-anthem-at-goshen-college-2/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jesusradicals.com/anarchism/resistance-to-the-national-anthem-at-goshen-college-2/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jesusradicals.com/anarchism/resistance-to-the-national-anthem-at-goshen-college-2/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike w</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2010/02/15/no-national-anthem-at-goshen-please/comment-page-1/#comment-14385</link>
		<dc:creator>mike w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3483#comment-14385</guid>
		<description>im a christian. I&#039;m not american. I don&#039;t want the last christian group that has resisted nationalistic violence to start singing an anthem thanks, where is the petition</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im a christian. I&#8217;m not american. I don&#8217;t want the last christian group that has resisted nationalistic violence to start singing an anthem thanks, where is the petition</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2010/02/15/no-national-anthem-at-goshen-please/comment-page-1/#comment-14384</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3483#comment-14384</guid>
		<description>&quot;Exactly what might this “necessary pride American Christians should feel” entail?&quot;

Something similar to to what Bonhoeffer&#039;s pride in Germany entailed.  Things that are, insofar as they are, are good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Exactly what might this “necessary pride American Christians should feel” entail?&#8221;</p>
<p>Something similar to to what Bonhoeffer&#8217;s pride in Germany entailed.  Things that are, insofar as they are, are good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2010/02/15/no-national-anthem-at-goshen-please/comment-page-1/#comment-14383</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/?p=3483#comment-14383</guid>
		<description>Like Hill fears, I smell &quot;radicalism for its own sake&quot; which is why I bring up the Goshen athlete at the Olympic games or world championships (to avoid the Olympics ranting). I think the real problem is that pacifists want NO identification with the nation-state even if it is Belize. This is strange and theologically unnecessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Hill fears, I smell &#8220;radicalism for its own sake&#8221; which is why I bring up the Goshen athlete at the Olympic games or world championships (to avoid the Olympics ranting). I think the real problem is that pacifists want NO identification with the nation-state even if it is Belize. This is strange and theologically unnecessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

