Category Archives: Holy Saturday

The Prayer of Holy Saturday

Triune God, who loves in freedom and hast chosen us from all eternity to be your creatures and your partners: in humility majestic and in powerlessness almighty, you have made our humanity your own.  In Jesus, you came closer to us than we are to ourselves, yet more like us though so greatly different from us; and in him rejected by his own and destroyed by law, religion, politics, you lived our life, you died our death, and you occupied our grave.

God the Son, for us, between your dying and rising, you lay buried in a tomb and descended into hell.  Cursed for our sin and extinguished by our perishing, you suffered all our agonies of pain and judgment and abandonment, succumbing to the evil one who held us in the grip of fear and guilt, and our world in bondage to injustice and to death.

God the Father, for us you freely gave up your beloved Son, sacrificed and surrendered him to death; and thus bereft, you added to our tears of shame, bewilderment and rage your own infinity of broken-heartedness and indignation at the tragic, proud estrangement of your children, and the wasteful corruption of your beautiful creation.

God the Spirit, for us you held together the forsaking Father and forsaken Son with unifying, resurrecting bonds of love, while death’s hostility, our hearts of sin, and all the hatred of a crooked universe tore your divine family asunder.  And still you groan beyond all utterance for creation’s liberation, interceding for your church when our faith stumbles and our tongues fall silent before the continuing tyranny of evil.

God the Three-in-One, whose unity is realized in communal exchange between the Father, Son and Spirit; eternal Lord, whose changeless, ever changing being is fulfilled in the dynamic of history and becoming: across the abyss of separation on the cross and in the grave you have reconciled the world and swallowed up our death, making space for our humanity within your divine community.  Hear our prayer for a world still living an Easter Saturday existence, oppressed and lonely, guilty of godlessness and convinced of godforsakenness.  Be still tomorrow the God you are today, and yesterday already were: God with us in the grave, but pulling the sting of death and promising in your final kingdom an even greater victory of abundant grace and life over the magnitude of sin and death.

And for your blessed burial, into which we were baptized, may you be glorified for evermore.  Amen.

~ Alan Lewis, Between Cross and Resurrection, 455. (Repost)

A very different power

This is one of my favorite quotes from Alan Lewis’s superb book, Between Cross and Resurrection. I figured it was definitely worth reposting this week:

It is a very different God, and a very different power, that we have discovered in the story of divine self-emptying, God’s capacity for weakness, the ability - without loss of Godness – to suffer and perhaps to die. This is the triune God of Jesus, fulfilled, majestic, glorified through self-expenditure in the lowly ignominy of our farthest country. There is power here, resurrecting, death-destroying, Devil-defeating; but it is the power of love, defying human expectation, which flowers in contradiction and negation, allowing sin its increase and giving death its day of victory, but only the more abundantly to outstrip both in the fecundity of grace and life. To live in the face of death an Easter Saturday existence, trusting in the weak but powerful love of the crucified and buried God, is itself to be objective, turned outward, away from self-reliance and self-preoccupation, away from our own determination to conquer death, which is in fact self-defeating and destructive. Instead, we are invited bravely and with frankness to admit or own defenselessness against the foe and entrust our self and destiny to the love of God which in its defenselessness proves creative and victorious.

Alan Lewis, Between Cross and Resurrection: A Theology of Holy Saturday (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001), 431.

The new and alien kingdom

Sean the Baptist pulls out some great quotes from one of my all-time favorite books, Between Cross and Resurrection, by Alan Lewis. They simply must be re-posted:

“What frightens and frees us simultaneously about this new and alien kingdom of God which Jesus preached and told of is the simple fact that it is God’s and not our own. That is a dark menace to the complacency and contentment of those who flourish under the kingdoms of this world; a shining vision of release and new beginnings to the victims of the present order; and perhaps also a mocking rebuke to the programs, projects, and pride of those who hope to create a new order by themselves. It is tragic, therefore, that a gospel which promises justice, love and peace only by insisting that these are God’s own gifts, which remain alien, foolish, and impossible except for grace alone, has continually been misconstrued and misappropriated as the goal and burden of human and Christian aspiration. Piously or politically, we cripple ourselves with the need to bring about God’s righteousness on earth, failing to hear what Jesus so vividly declares: that we need not shoulder that burden because the goal itself does not need to be accomplished. The goal is a fact, God’s fact, the fact of grace and promise. No gap divides what God says from what God does; and the stories of the coming kingdom do not offer dreams and possibilities of what the Lord might or could do, but speak indicatively, and in the present tense, of what is happening, and of what the future is becoming. The kingdom needed not – and cannot – be worked for; it may only be accepted and awaited.” (23-24).

“To be quite blunt about a matter we must soon think through to its extremity, that story [the story told of Jesus] unites the Lord God with a human corpse – with a man who has in some eyes been murdered by criminals and in others executed as a criminal . The impossible foolishness of this – that after such a fate a man should be raised to life with God, and into such a human fate God’s very self, the Lord of glory should have fallen – is the supreme test of our willingness not to conform story to what we already understand, but to reconform our understanding to the story that we hear.” (25-26).

Can We Copy God? A Holy Saturday Sermon

Welcome again, to Holy Saturday dear people of God.  We come together again, as we seek to follow Christ on his journey for us and our salvation, and find ourselves in a silent place.  We stand in the middle of the great triduum, the three great days of our Lord’s work. These three days are the holiest of days.  What happened on these days long ago are the only events that ever truly changed the world. And today we find ourselves living once again in the day of silence. Living on the boundary between Good Friday and Holy Easter, we find ourselves stopped for a moment, to tread water with Christ in his being-dead for us.  Today we are stopped in our tracks by the narrative of death and burial.

Unlike the disciples who walked with our Lord all those years ago, we of course know that the resurrection is coming.  And to know that Jesus will be raised is another way of saying that we know that Jesus is God in the flesh.  We know that Jesus is how God identifies himself.  When we want to tell someone who another is, we point to various identifying marks.  “Mike is the one who is married to Hilda and went to high school at Thunderbird academy.”  We identify people by stories (which are lived relationships).  So, when we seek to identify God, the only way we have of doing that is by saying, “Remember Jesus, how he lived among us, suffered, died and was buried (and rose again, but let’s just hang on for a second)?  That is God.”

And so, we are confronted with the scandal of a God who is revealed in suffering and death.  What kind of God would this be who showed us his nature through a suffering and dead man?  The response of the church has always and only been that the answer to this question can only be put into the following formula: “God is love.”  If God is revealed by suffering and death for us and our salvation, then the only ultimate thing we can say about God is that he is love.  “God is love” is the most profound and irreducible theological statement ever made.  For Christians, “love” is a shorthand way of saying “death and resurrection”.  And thus, what we see in Jesus is the unleashing of the unlimited love that God is.

And that is what the doctrine of the Trinity is about.  The Trinity, far from being an abstract doctrine about how the number 1 can also be the number 3, is the church’s effort to stay true to its confession that God is love.  What we have experienced of God is that his love is given to us in Christ, who shows us that the Father, whom he loves and obeys, loves us so much that he would give up his own Son for us, and that love comes to dwell in our hearts by someone called the Holy Spirit.  If “love” is a shorthand way of saying “death and resurrection”, then “Trinity” is a shorthand way of saying what God must be like if the story of death and resurrection is true.

Through what we see in Christ we know that God is Trinity.  What God is in himself is a communion of persons who exist in pure relationality with one another.  In the Trinity everything is shared between the divine persons.  Between the Father, Son, and Spirit all the riches of God’s plenitude, his glory, and beauty are endless given one to the other.  In God, none of the persons of the Trinity hold on to anything of themselves, rather they constantly give, give, and give again.  God’s life is a life of infinite, superabundant gift-giving.  It is a relational space in which selfishness, self-assertion, and self-protection are literally meaningless.   In God there is only giving and receiving.  There is no taking and there is no possessing.  And it is only because God is this kind of God that he can give himself away to us, as we see him doing in Christ.  Or, put the other way around, because in Christ we see God giving himself to us so infinitely, we know that God must by pure and unending giving in himself.

Because God’s life is the eternal abundance of triune joy forever given and never held onto, God can freely give himself away to the fullest while remaining what he most truly is.  The Son’s self-giving obedience to the Father to the point of death and the loving Father’s horrifying surrender of his beloved Son are the truest glimpses we have of the eternal Eucharistic self-renunciation that the Triune God eternally is.  God is free to descend into the depths of sin, death and hell because the depths of the Trinitarian love are infinite, capable of traversing every distance, journeying beyond every boundary.  There is nowhere the divine love cannot go.  There is no self-giving, no self-limitation, no self-renunciation that the divine love fails to pour out.  In God there is no self-possession, no self-protection.  In God there is only the infinite depths of God’s self-emptying love.  The Father who empties himself of all things to bestow them on the Son, the Son who hands all things back over to the Father, and the Spirit who grasps nothing for himself but delights to communicate the Trinitarian love to both the Father and Son.

On Holy Saturday, God proves that there is no abyss of sin and godlessness that he cannot descend into.  The depths of God’s love run every bit as deep as the depths of sin and death which we unleash upon the world.  And tomorrow we will learn that the depths of God’s love run infinitely deeper than the abyss of sin…but we’re not there yet.

What I want to focus us on as we contemplate the story of Jesus on Holy Saturday, and the way in which that tells us the true story of God is the question of how our life and action in this world is to be shaped by this radical vision of divine love.  We have said many times that just as God is a community of mutual love and self-giving, so also we are called to be a community of love and self-giving.  We, as the church, the body of Christ who are brought into the life of God through the Spirit are called, we think to in some finite, creaturely way, be an echo of the love that God is in himself.

But this is where it gets complicated.  How can we even presume to image God in his triune fullness?  The Father, Son, and Spirit are bound together in a love so profound that they are one being.  This is a great, ineffable mystery.  How could we ever image a unity as perfect as that between the persons of the Trinity?  And on this point many theologians have criticized those who would argue that the church should be seen as imaging the Trinity.  The Trinity, they say simply has no created analogue.  God alone is God, and we are humans.

There is a definite element of truth in this statement.  We are not God, nor are we both God and human as Christ is.  Rather we are humans who have been united with Christ, captivated by the Spirit and have the love of the Father poured out into our hearts.  We certainly are not the Trinity.  We are the recipients of salvation that comes from the Trinity.  These distinctions must never be lost.  Nevertheless, the Scriptures repeatedly tell us that humankind was made in the image of God, which was restored in Christ.  And all throughout the New Testament we find ourselves encouraged to “imitate God.”  What sounds like idolatry or hubris, however is in fact an ethical calling, indeed one that takes its shape from the cross of Christ:  “Welcome one another, as God in Christ has welcomed you.”

When we say that we are called to be the ikon of the Trinity in the world, we don’t mean that we somehow mirror the structure of the relations between the Father and Son, as if in this context I represent the Father and you represent the Son or some nonsense like that.  We don’t seek to think of ourselves as the ikon of God’s circular, heavenly self-giving.  We don’t exist in that heaven, not yet.  We still live in the world of sin and death as Holy Saturday shows so clearly.  Thus, when we look at the God of Holy Saturday, the trinitarian, cruciform God and ask ourselves how we might possibly image this kind of love, we find ourselves drawn into God’s loving descent into the depths of our sin for our salvation.  For us to be the ikon of the Trinity is not to say that we reflect in some ideal way the eternal gift-giving abundance of the triune persons.  Rather it is to say that we are called to an ethical vocation of being conformed to Christ and his cross.  What the eternal love of the Trinity looks like in the world of sin and death is the cross and the grave of Christ.  When we say that we, as the church are the image of the Trinity, we are making the daring statement that we are joining in the pattern of Christ, in giving ourselves away, in expending ourselves for other, in putting others before ourselves, in loving others even to the point of death for their sake.  This is what the life of the Trinity looks like when translated into the life of the sinful world.

And so, dear people of God, as we seek to live and be the body of Christ, the one who descended into hell for us, his body lying cold in the grave, let us with humility and sobriety remember the horrifically great cost of love.  God’s love for us cost him what was most precious to him, his own Son.  If we would follow God, if we would be the ikon of his love in the world, the same pattern of self-giving must be true of us.  We must, if we seek to follow God, descend into the world of sin and suffering and expend our love on all the unlovely people that we meet.  And, as with Christ it may mean our death.  But here is the miracle of Holy Saturday: Because Christ has died our death for us, we are never alone in death.  “For this reason Christ died and lived again, that he might be the Lord of both the dead and the living.”

Amen.

The Prayer of Holy Saturday

Triune God, who loves in freedom and hast chosen us from all eternity to be your creatures and your partners: in humility majestic and in powerlessness almighty, you have made our humanity your own.  In Jesus, you came closer to us than we are to ourselves, yet more like us though so greatly different from us; and in him rejected by his own and destroyed by law, religion, politics, you lived our life, you died our death, and you occupied our grave.

God the Son, for us, between your dying and rising, you lay buried in a tomb and descended into hell.  Cursed for our sin and extinguished by our perishing, you suffered all our agonies of pain and judgment and abandonment, succumbing to the evil one who held us in the grip of fear and guilt, and our world in bondage to injustice and to death.

God the Father, for us you freely gave up your beloved Son, sacrificed and surrendered him to death; and thus bereft, you added to our tears of shame, bewilderment and rage your own infinity of broken-heartedness and indignation at the tragic, proud estrangement of your children, and the wasteful corruption of your beautiful creation.

God the Spirit, for us you held together the forsaking Father and forsaken Son with unifying, resurrecting bonds of love, while death’s hostility, our hearts of sin, and all the hatred of a crooked universe tore your divine family asunder.  And still you groan beyond all utterance for creation’s liberation, interceding for your church when our faith stumbles and our tongues fall silent before the continuing tyranny of evil.

God the Three-in-One, whose unity is realized in communal exchange between the Father, Son and Spirit; eternal Lord, whose changeless, ever changing being is fulfilled in the dynamic of history and becoming: across the abyss of separation on the cross and in the grave you have reconciled the world and swallowed up our death, making space for our humanity within your divine community.  Hear our prayer for a world still living an Easter Saturday existence, oppressed and lonely, guilty of godlessness and convinced of godforsakenness.  Be still tomorrow the God you are today, and yesterday already were: God with us in the grave, but pulling the sting of death and promising in your final kingdom an even greater victory of abundant grace and life over the magnitude of sin and death.

And for your blessed burial, into which we were baptized, may you be glorified for evermore.  Amen.

~ Alan Lewis, Between Cross and Resurrection, 455.

Balthasar at the Center

Two of my favorite books, as I’ve mentioned many times are David Bentley Hart’s The Beauty of the Infinite and Alan Lewis’ Between Cross and Resurrection. And, in terms of theological conclusions, you would be hard-pressed to find two books that come to more radically different conclusions. Lewis’ study is a bold attempt to seriously think the reality of Holy Saturday, the day of Christ’s death and descent into hell. Lewis attempts to take the historical reality of Christ’s triduum with absolute seriousness for how we begin to think the being of the Triune God. Refusing to go behind the revelation of God in the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ, Lewis insists that the radical interval of suffering and death seen in Good Friday and Holy Saturday cannot be dismissed by the light of Easter Sunday. The light of the resurrection only lengthens the shadow of the cross for it establishes that the one who died, who experienced the ultimate terminus of descent into the fullness of death and godforsakeness was indeed God in the flesh. If this is so then notions of divine passibility, temporality, and grace must be radically re-thought without attempting to circumvent the radicality of the narrative on the basis of what we “know” is metaphysically fitting for God to be God.

Hart, by contrast paints his vision of God on the basis of God’s resplendent, infinite glory, as seen in the resurrection. It is the always-already complete reality of God’s fullness, his replete plentitude that enfolds and immediately consumes and destroys any finite interval that seeks to determine God’s life. The suffering and death of Christ, for Hart are not events which truly occur within the being of God, despite all appearances to the contrary in the economy of salvation. Rather these events are simply the event of creation being seized up into God’s Trinitarian beauty without introducing anything new into the being of God. Christ’s suffering and death are, for Hart, as for many of the patristic fathers, simply realities proper to his human nature. God as such, despite what we see in Christ, does not suffer, is not implicated in created history. Rather God enters into history out of needless, gratuitous grace, always enfolding any perceived interval of finitude, suffering, and death with his own unchanging always-already actualized life of joy, feasting, and peace.

Personally, I find both theologian’s cases beautifully compelling, both as pieces of theological writing and argument. I suppose I should come clean and admit that I find Lewis more persuasive, though I think that these two thinkers could be brought to a wonderfully illuminating meeting of the minds (were Lewis alive, that is).

However, the point I really want to introduce in describing these two thinkers has to do with their respective dependence on Hans Urs von Balthasar. One could, I contend, parse the difference between Hart and Lewis on the basis of how they differently appropriate and extend certain of Balthasar’s key theological trajectories. Lewis follows in Balthasar’s train, exploring to the furthest limits the trajectory of Balthasar’s theology of Holy Saturday as laid out in Mysterium Paschale and The Glory of the Lord (see especially volume 6). Hart however pursues the logic of Balthasar’s theology of the immanent Trinity, which for Balthasar is extrapolated from the economic Trinity and which is its metaphysical ground. The immanent Trinity is an infinite fullness of primal kenosis which grounds and enfolds the suffering and death of Christ.

The funny thing is that the most radically opposed claims made by both Hart and Lewis can be found in almost identical form being affirmed by Balthasar. For Balthasar, as for Lewis, the interval of Holy Saturday is a real interval in the life of the Trinity. The suffering and death of Christ are events in the very life of God. Conversely, for Balthasar as for Hart, God is always-already replete in God’s Trinitarian plenitude and kenosis which enfolds and grounds God’s economic activity in the world. The infinite distance and difference between the Triune persons is the holy distance into which the unholy distance of sin is transposed and apocalyptically consumed in the ardor of God’s holy fire, God’s inexhaustible life of Love. For Balthasar, God’s being does indeed include economic events, even events as radical as suffering, death, and godforsakenness. When Christ suffers and dies, we behold the true and real suffering and death of God. However God’s being is not overcome or determined by these events precisely because of the intensity of the eternal life of Trinitarian self-giving, God’s primal kenosis.  The Triune life of infinite distance and freedom is not delimited or determined by its free taking of sin and death into itself. The Triune God freely and openly allows the reality of sin, death, and nothingness a true and real interruption into the divine life, as witnessed on Good Friday and Holy Saturday, and just so enfolds it, timefully into the replete, inexhaustible plenitude of God’s life. Here Balthasar is able, beautifully, to affirm the positive claims of Hart and Lewis without being sucked into affirming the oppositional logic that seems to separate their positions. As such, it seems that Balthasar represents a site where the radical and beautiful theologies represented by Hart and Lewis could come to an even more radical rapprochement.

Judas & Jeremiah: A Holy Saturday Homily

Holy Saturday is perhaps the most vivid symbol of what it means to live between the already and the not yet. On Holy Saturday the horrors of the crucifixion (which unbeknownst to the disciples were actually the glories of God’s self giving) are past and the glories of the resurrection are still lying ahead in the unanticipated future. In the in-between time we are left with nothing but empty silence and lots of time on our hands. The great question that Holy Saturday brings to us, the followers of Christ, is that of how we are to live when everything that makes sense disappears and everything we know seems turned upside down. What do we do when sisters die of cancer, friends fall to their deaths and brothers who were once partners in the gospel run away from us?* And what do we do after those times have passed and we are left with nothing but time to sit in silence and contemplate our brokenness? How do we live as the church of Holy Saturday? How do we be a people who can listen, speak, and hope on the day of silence and confusion? I think two “Holy Saturday” experiences from the Scriptures give us a good clue.

Perhaps no one other than Jesus experienced the horrors of Holy Saturday like Judas. Matthew is careful to tell us that after betraying Jesus, Judas experienced a major change of mind, stumbling back to the place of his transgression and seeking absolution.

When Judas, his betrayer, saw that Jesus was condemned, he repented and brought back the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and the elders. He said, “I have sinned by betraying innocent blood.” But they said, “What is that to us? See to it yourself.” Throwing down the pieces of silver in the temple, he departed; and he went and hanged himself. But the chief priests, taking the pieces of silver, said, “It is not lawful to put them into the treasury, since they are blood money.” After conferring together, they used them to buy the potter’s field as a place to bury foreigners. For this reason that field has been called the Field of Blood to this day. Then was fulfilled what had been spoken through the prophet Jeremiah, “And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of the one on whom a price had been set, on whom some of the people of Israel had set a price, and they gave them for the potter’s field, as the Lord commanded me.” (Matt. 27:3-10)

Judas repents, confesses his sin, retraces his steps and seeks to return his blood money and most of all seems to long for some kind of absolution from the leaders of the people of God, the chief priests. But in response to his confession, Judas is brushed coldly aside – “What is that to us?” and commanded to go on alone – “See to it yourself.” He is left alone, forsaken and abandoned in the depths of his transgression. And it is important to note that his going out and hanging himself were not in response to the death of Jesus, but to his rejection by the religious leaders. He is told to “see to it himself” and, being thus left alone and without recourse he goes and hangs himself.

Judas’ is the ultimate act of Holy Saturday despair. In the face of the horrors that have been unleashed and which he is complicit with and being left alone, rejected by all he is left to nothing except to take his own life. Judas is left alone without a face of love to call him out of his fixation on his own horrible failure. In his appeal to the priests he is met with the harshest words possible. Do you seek a future for your guilty, treacherous life? “See to it yourself.” Are you dwelling alone in a place of silence, despair and utter hopelessness? “What is that to us?” And as the priests use Judas’ blood money to purchase his graveyard they turn any chance for healing and hope into a nightmarish hell of Saturday despair.

But even more troubling is the fact that all the disciples seem to have totally forgotten their lost brother. They are all scattered (except for the women, who follow Jesus all the way to his grave [Mk. 15:47; Lk. 23:45]), attending to their own despair. They are too absorbed in their own failures and perhaps anger at Judas to stand between him and his noose. They may have stuck together after the death of Jesus, but did they even give a second thought to Judas? Was his sin even beyond the thought of forgiveness for them?

What we have in the story of Judas and the disciples is one of Saturday despair. The horror of the day of silence, when everything unravels is faced by Judas alone. With no brother to stand beside him and no priest to offer him forgiveness he is driven into the Field of Blood to end his life with a noose. This is a Holy Saturday possibility that we all face. Will we be the disciples, who ignored the broken, the guilty and the godforsaken on the day of silence and shame? Or worse yet, will we be the priests who callously cast off the repentant offenders?

But this is not the only story of disciples on “Holy Saturday.” It is no accident that in his account of the Field of Blood, Matthew points back to the prophet Jeremiah and the story of a different field, on a different “Holy Saturday” occasion. In Jeremiah 32 we are told the story of how Israel is on the verge of being overrun by Babylon. There is no hope for Israel on this one and Jeremiah knows this all to well. And yet, out of the blue the word of the Lord comes to Jeremiah that he is to buy a field which will almost certainly be stripped from him in the near future. Jeremiah’s purchase of the “field at Anathoth” is the opposite of Judas’ Field of Blood. Jeremiah, in the face of certain destruction and death, takes a stance of hope rather than despair. His “field of hope” flies in the face of Judas’ Field of Blood. Jeremiah is like a child building a sandcastle in front of a tidal wave, a beautiful act of senseless hope in the face of overwhelming hopelessness.

It is this way of living in Holy Saturday that we are called to as the church. In the face of hopelessness and death we are called to be conduits of hope that dare to speak and listen on the day of silence. We are to dare to continue to give of ourselves, even to the point of death even when all hope seems to have vanished. When foundations dissolve, when brothers betray and God seems silent, we are called to buy fields of hope, to stand between our betrayer and his noose and to break bread together in senseless hope that we serve a God who abounds in surprises that follow the day of silence. We are bound to remember Holy Saturday and to live in it in senseless, glorious hope. Let us be a church that lives in Holy Saturday, longing to see the surprises of the self-giving God who transforms fields of blood into fields of hope. We are called this day to continue in the form of the self-giving that is the very life of God. On this day, this cold and silent yet gloriously beautiful day, let us remember the brokenness and the senselessness that we face as followers of Christ. And then let us gather up our courage in the Spirit and continue to give ourselves away without ceasing. In the deathly quiet of Holy Saturday, let us interrupt it with songs of hope, bread broken and lives poured out.

*[Side note: these are all events that did indeed happen to my church the year that I first gave this sermon]

***I owe many of the inisights of this whole discussion to Eric Severson, “Listening on the Day of Silence: Khora and Holy Saturday,” Paper presented at the Wesleyan Theological Society Conference, 2005***

Between Cross & Resurrection: A Review

This is a modifed version of a review that I wrote on Amazon some time ago. As we are now entering Holy Week, I thought it was a fitting time for such a post. Let me just lay my cards on the table and say up front that Between Cross and Resurrection, remains one of the most moving and powerful works in theology that I have ever read. Alan Lewis was a masterful writer and theologian whose character, passion and humility is apparent on every page of this wonderful book.

As the title suggests, this book seeks to unpack the relevance of Holy Saturday (the day Christ lay dead in the grave “between cross and resurrection’) for Christian theology and life. The fact is, there are few areas of Christian doctrine and practice this book does not touch on in some significant way. This book is a brilliant exercise in narrative theology, which situates a trinitarian doctrine of God within the thoroughly narrative framework of the Church’s three-day story of the crucifixion, burial and resurrection of Christ. The first section of the book essentially involves telling the three-day story that stands at the center of our salvation and then begins to unpack its implications for our understanding of the nature and power of God and for theological ethics.

The central thesis that Lewis advances throughout the book is that Jesus’ statement that ‘those who lose their lives will find them’ is not only true of us, but is antecendently true of God. The Triune God is the one who knows how to die and thereby enter into the fullness of resurrection life. The key theme that Lewis plays up here is not the suffering of the cross overwhelming the victory of resurrection, but rather how the resurrection forces us to think about radical nature of the suffering and death of God in Christ. Since the resurrection confirms that Christ was in fact God, when we reflect back on Holy Saturday we are left with the shocking reality that God is found and identified among the suffering and the dead. The way that the Triune God overcomes the powers of sin and death is not by matching them with brute power, but by surrendering to them and then abounding all the more in overflowing life. The key verse the Lewis often returns to is Paul’s statement “where sin increased, grace abounded all the more so that, as sin reigned in death, grace might reign through righteousness leading to eternal life in Jesus Christ, our Lord.” (Rom. 5:20-21). God’s way of dealing with sin and death is not to overthrow them through power, but to surrender to them and then abound still more with resurrection life that cannot be surpassed by sin and death. The second section involves more explicit theological unpacking of the three-day story.

In particular, Lewis focuses on the trinitarian context in which the theology of the cross, grave and resurrection must be understood. In one of the best chapters in the book, “From God’s Passion to God’s Death” Lewis brilliantly demolishes conventional conceptions of God’s omnipotence and other central elements of classical theism which derive from Greek and Modern thought rather than the narratives of the cross. Through an examination of Barth, Moltmann and Juengel, Lewis shows that God’s very nature and the very form of his power is seen through the suffering love and weakness of the cross and the grave through which the ever abundant life of resurrection breaks forth. I cannot begin to do justice to the ways that Lewis formulates all of this. The implications are staggering. If the very from of God’s power is seen in surrendering to the powers of sin and death through love and then faithfully awaiting a transcendent hope on the other side of negation and death, then our perspective on violence, oppression and injustice is radically transformed.

The final section of the book deals specifically with our practice of living in light of the three-day story. Lewis offers an amazing chapter on world history where he particularly discusses Auschwitz, Hiroshima and Chernobyl. He then moves on to articulate a theological politics that derives from the narrative of Holy Saturday. He follows this up with discussions of the the church’s mission to the wider culture as the cruciform and “grave-shaped” followers of Christ, setting out an excellent discussion of missional ethics and theology. Finally, he sets forth a vision for the church as the trinitarian community of mutual love, peace and self-donation.

Lewis was not only a brilliant theologian, but a brilliant writer whose theology of Holy Saturday was born out by his own Holy Saturday experience of terminal cancer. I have learned much from this amazing book, and I intend to return to it repeatedly in days to come. In particular I find myself coming back to it every Lent, as I prepare to teach on Holy Saturday as I do every year during Holy Week. I cannot recommend this book highly enough.

Holy Saturday: What Kind of Harrowing?

This weekend, I was at my church’s covenant retreat when all members of the church go away together to celebrates the Lord’s covenant with us, and our commitment to one another as members of Christ’s body. And, as we do every year each of us was given the name of a sister of brother to bring a gift for. I was happy to receive a book I have been waiting for for some time, Light in Darkness by Alyssa Pitstick in which she rigorously examines Hans Urs von Balthasar’s doctrine of Christ’s descent into hell. Essentially, Pitstick argues that Balthasar’s doctrine of Christ’s descent is unavoidably in contradiction to the totality of the Catholic tradition’s teaching on the descent into hell. For her, Balthasar’s view that Christ’s descent into hell entails his experience of the fullness of alienation, sin and death, which he then absorbs, transfigures, and defeats through resurrection is untenable. She insists that the totality of the tradition holds that Christ in fact descends only to the “limbo of the Fathers” in which the righteous, justified dead of the Old Testament awaited the coming of the Messiah. Christ’s descent is not in any way soteriological, rather it is…well, we’re not quite sure what it’s for. At best it seems that he goes to an already-redeemed bunch of Old Testament saints to let them know that he’s defeated death. He certainly doesn’t descend into hell and experience the depths of alienation between God and man opened up by sin. In fact, he doesn’t come in contact with sin whatsoever in his descent, only those saints of old who were already justified.

Now, this book has already set off something of a debate among Balthasar enthusiasts, and I’m sure you can tell that I’m among them. I think Pittstick has written a flawed book on a number of levels. First, it is a decidedly one-sided reading of the tradition on Christ’s descent into hell. She pretends that the Fathers were unanimous about this, when in fact they varied in opinion on this as much as they did on every other doctrine. Second, while Pitstick is bold in her theological claims, as any young theologian should be, she ends up letting her ideas run away with her and manages to turn boldness into outright arrogance. She directly questions Balthasar’s orthodoxy, accusing him point blank of formulating a theology that is a “conscious rejection of Catholic tradition.” Apparently she considers her newly Ph.D-crowned intellect the superior of the previous and current popes in determining the orthodox status of Cardinals of the Catholic Church! Third, her engagement of Scripture is very shallow, brief, and selective. She doesn’t touch Romans, probably because it entirely contradicts her case. While I am not a Catholic, I think most Catholics, including the Magisterium insist that they would rather be at variance with the tradition than with Scripture, for according to Vatican II’s decree on revelation, Dei Verbum, the “teaching office of the Church is not above the word of God, but serves it”. However, this seems to have no clout with Pitstick.

For those interested, there is a spirited exchange between Pitstick and Edward Oakes, available in First Things. There is both an initial, and follow up interchange between them available online. Oakes, I think demolishes Pitstick’s case, particularly showing how it is decidedly biased against protestant theological insights, Scripture, and bears extreme Christological problems, chiefly Pitstick’s monophysite tendencies.

Now, I do think Pitstick’s book is important in that it calls attention to the stream in the tradition of the Harrowing of Hell, in which Holy Saturday is the beginning of Christ’s triumph over death. I think this is an important image that must be held dialectically in tension with Balthasar’s biblical emphasis on Christ’s descent into the fullness of death, so as to be “Lord of both the dead and the living” (Romans 5). Christ does indeed break down the gates of Hell, and as the Icon powerfully shows, pull Adam and Eve from their graves, ripping all of sinful humanity from the clutches of death. But he does this not from without, or even from within Pitstick’s rather immaculate limbo. He does it precisely from within, descending into the depths of our sin and alienation from God, and only thusly, by plumbing the depths of hell does he suffuse all that is lost and sinful with the radiance of divine goodness, joy, and light. Christ is indeed the Harrower of Hell, but his harrowing takes place in the mode of cruciformity, not crusade. This is the shape of our redemption, of divine Triune abundance that is the living union of power and powerlessness. In short, it is the superabundance of life that flourishes always, and only through the practice of life poured out.

Power in Weakness: Alan Lewis on Holy Saturday

“It is a very different God, and a very different power, that we have discovered in the story of divine self-emptying, God’s capacity for weakness, the ability - without loss of Godness – to suffer and perhaps to die. This is the triune God of Jesus, fulfilled, majestic, glorified through self-expenditure in the lowly ignominy of our farthest country. There is power here, resurrecting, death-destroying, Devil-defeating; but it is the power of love, defying human expectation, which flowers in contradiction and negation, allowing sin its increase and giving death its day of victory, but only the more abundantly to outstrip both in the fecundity of grace and life. To live in the face of death an Easter Saturday existence, trusting in the weak but powerful love of the crucified and buried God, is itself to be objective, turned outward, away from self-reliance and self-preoccupation, away from our own determination to conquer death, which is in fact self-defeating and destructive. Instead, we are invited bravely and with frankness to admit or own defenselessness against the foe and entrust our self and destiny to the love of God which in its defenselessness proves creative and victorious.”

Alan Lewis, Between Cross and Resurrection: A Theology of Holy Saturday (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001), 431.

Switch to our mobile site